Ethanol revisited
An anonymous person left rather uninformed comments in response to my "Ethanol: still not worth the price" entry.
EidelblogDefending individual liberty against the tyranny of government.
|
Perry Eidelbus, Der Eidelblogger Westchester, New York |
posted by Perry Eidelbus at 12:05 AM
Friends & comrades
Don Luskin
Capital Freedom
Chris Masse
Brad Warbiany
Joe Sherlock
QandO
Mover Mike
Josh - No Angst
Chicago Boyz
Josh Hendrickson - Everyday Economist
Hispanic Pundit
GOPinion
Alarming News
Club for Growth
On Tap - Marshall Mason et al
Hangar Dogs
Three Sources
William J. Beck
BFLO, Buffalo's Best Blog
Pundit Review
Tennessee Tax Revolt
3 Comments:
And in all caps. Way to win an argument.
Curious if you have any comments about use of ethanol in Brazil. It is reported the cane process used gets a decent ER/EI.
I had touched on Brazil's use of sugar ethanol here. Brazil produces so much sugar as a percentage of its economy that sugarcane-derived ethanol is now an economical fuel. That is, it's competitive now because oil has gotten more expensive.
The increased demand for sugar has driven up prices to their highest in seven years. It's perfectly expected. So when someone says we need to switch the country from petroleum to ethanol, he ignores that corn (and ethanol) would necessarily get more expensive. Price controls? Yeah. Sure. But, after all, the person who suggested that also thinks that the senators from New York, Connecticut and California are "big oil's champions." With Schumer screaming "price gouging!" as loudly as anyone, he's a friend to big oil?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home